Higher pair — where it appears
Named by 16 essays across 7 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
A joint is a surface that slides on itself
Twenty-two fields of this collection have declared their joints and then counted what those joints take away. A count cannot tell a pin from a slide — both are one. What a joint actually permits is a set of displacements closed under composition, and it can be computed from the shape of the surface: one linear condition per point, and the answer is a null space.
A joint that works one way
A pawl either holds a ratchet or is levered out of it, and which one happens is decided by two lines through the contact. One of them is the rule a workshop quotes. The other is the boundary that rule leaves out, and a check written to confirm the quoted rule turned out to be incapable of failing.
A roller is not a slider
A scissor lift has one degree of freedom, at every height and for any number of stages. Grübler's criterion agrees — if the rollers under it are counted as pins in slots. Count them as slider blocks, which is how every textbook draws a slider, and the same formula declares a machine holding a car in the air to be a structure with minus one.
Counting and measuring mobility
Grübler's criterion counts links and joints and never asks how long anything is. The rank of the constraint Jacobian measures the lengths and never asks what a joint is. Two calculations with no inputs in common, producing one number — which is the only arrangement under which agreement is evidence.
What one contact forbids
A rotation about a point is a twist, and a twist is affine in the point — so what a single contact permits is a half-plane of centres, with the boundary being the contact surface's own line. Reuleaux drew it in 1875 and it is exact rather than sampled, which is why every figure in this field is a picture of the plane rather than of a cone.
What each joint takes away
Grübler's formula has a 2 in it for pins and a 1 for cam contacts, and those numbers are not conventions to be memorised. They are the number of constraints each kind of joint imposes, they are measurable as the rank of a matrix, and miscounting one of them is the commonest way the formula is got wrong.
One test, three mechanisms
Whether a pawl holds, whether an escapement's lock draws itself deeper, and how much a four-bar's coupler can do for its rocker are the same question asked three times: on which side of a pivot does a contact normal pass? All three are one cross product, none evaluates a force, and the three answers are used for completely different things.
The freedom that is a set
Grübler's rule has been in this collection since its first essay, and it adds up numbers. Each of those numbers is the dimension of a group of displacements, and the group has eleven siblings the number cannot distinguish. The count is not wrong; it is a projection, and this is what the projection discards.
One freedom, and a motion that never repeats
Mesh a gear on each crank of a five-bar and the count and the rank agree that one freedom is left, at every gear ratio. Whether the machine ever comes back to where it started is a different question, and neither instrument can see it: at 3 to 2 it is home after two turns, at 37 to 23 after twenty-three, and at the golden ratio never, with its nearest returns at the Fibonacci numbers.
A higher pair has no group
A disc resting on a straight edge may slide along it and may turn about its own centre. Both keep the contact exactly. Do one and then the other and the contact lifts off the edge by |t sin φ| — up to 1.2 radii over an ordinary range — so the two freedoms are real and the pair of them is not closed. The count is still right and there is nothing for it to be the dimension of.
Six things a joint is not
A freedom count read as a description, a screw system read as a group, a pair list read as a convention, a trajectory read as a determination, a nominal alignment read as a delivered one, and a higher pair read as a larger joint. Six claims, each of them what a careful person would say, each answered with a number.
A contact turns and slides at once
A cam on its follower, a gear tooth or a pin in a slot takes one freedom away where a pin or a slide takes two, and it turns as well as slides. Give every joint of the four-bar, Watt's and Stephenson's chains a third label and there are 1,317 different chains. The rule that read slides off the graph extends to all of them, agreeing with the constraint rank on every one, and the two obvious shortcuts miss 36 and 769. What the graph cannot record is which way a contact's normal points — and on these chains that never matters, while a single stop added to a four-bar holds everywhere except through one point.
A stop aimed at its pole holds by curvature
A stop whose normal passes through its pole forbids nothing at first order, and whether it holds at all is decided by curvature. For a round nose the deciding curve is not the one it touches: the seat that just holds is the path of the nose's centre moved out by the nose, 1.193 on a four-bar where the contact point's own circle says 0.776. Past it, one contact holds both ways — loosely, as the square root of its clearance.
A seat with friction stays where it is pushed
A stop aimed through its pole holds a four-bar by curvature, because its normal has no lever about the pole. Friction has one, and the obvious guess is that it lets such a stop hold at first order. It does something narrower and stranger. It cannot hold what curvature releases, since a gap that opens carries no force for friction to be a share of. It makes a seat that holds up to twenty-six times stiffer, turning its cube-root give into a square root. And it makes any stop whose pole lies inside its friction cone stay where a load pushed it: released, the seat at the pole does not come back.
Return and stiffness come from the same aim
A stop with friction looked like a trade: aim it near its pole and friction multiplies its stiffness seventeen times, aim it outside the friction cone and it springs back when released. The trade is an artefact of how the gain was counted. Friction's factor multiplies a stiffness that vanishes at the pole, and measured outright a stop aimed further away is stiffer at every friction — 271 per radian at 1.1° and 104,000 at 21.3° with none, 4,631 and 184,000 at a coefficient of 0.3. Return and stiffness are bought by the same aim. What the aim costs is the other side: a face aimed off its pole holds nothing the other way, so a stop that must return both ways is a V of two faces, and across a friction band from 0.1 to 0.2 a V aimed 12.3° each way returns from both and is 8,800 times stiffer than the seat at the pole.
A V pressed onto its nose has a window
A V of two faces holds a four-bar's coupler both ways and returns it, as long as each face is aimed off the coupler's pole by more than the friction angle. Squeeze the nose between both faces and two different things can happen. A rigid V cut a hundred-thousandth tight cannot lock, because the crank moves the nose across the V and never into it; it only stops short of home, inside a dead band that is μ/tan ψ of the play an equally loose fit would leave. A V pressed on by a spring, as a detent is, rides back along its own axis, and that is the direction a wedge locks in. It returns from an aim of arctan μ at the contact and locks at 90° less arctan μ about its axis, so its aim has a window, and the V that is most nearly reversible inside it is a right angle.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
MobilityContact normalConstraintGrübler's criterionLower pairDegrees of freedomClearanceDisplacement subgroupKinematic pairRankConstraint jacobianDesign rule