Machine Kinematics
solved, then drawn
Concept

Solutions at infinity — where it appears

Roots that a polynomial system acquires from the way it was written rather than from the mechanism, sitting where a coordinate runs away. They inflate the Bézout bound and have to be discounted before a count of solutions means anything about a machine.

Named by 4 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

What became of Bézout's paths. four-bar coupler pin: 2 of 4 paths arrived at a solution and 2 went to infinity; 3-RPR platform: 6 of 16 paths arrived at a solution and 10 went to infinity; Gough, generic: 80 of 1458 paths arrived at a solution and 1378 went to infinity. The surplus is not merely wasted — it is cheap: a path on its way to infinity is abandoned in a handful of steps, while every path that arrives is tracked in full.

The paths that leave

Bézout's number over-counts, and the over-count is enormous — 1,458 tracked paths for 80 solutions. The obvious response is to find a method that tracks only the paths that arrive. That method exists, it was built, and it is four times slower, because the surplus paths are not merely surplus. They are cheap.

algebra · Algebra The twelve that were at infinity, coming back. Every solution of the platform's direct kinematics, plotted by how far from the origin it sits, as the six anchors are jittered. At no jitter the site's own platform has 56 solutions and the largest is at 25.8. At a jitter of 0.2 there are 80, and the extra ones arrive from far out — they were never missing, they were at infinity.

Twenty-eight, not forty

The general six-legged platform has forty poses for a given set of leg lengths, and this site has quoted that number beside a picture of a platform that has twenty-eight. Its anchors are arranged symmetrically, which makes it a special architecture, and the missing twelve poses are not missing. They are at infinity, and perturbing the anchors brings them back.

algebra · Algebra How many times each curve passes through the circular points. For each body of five machines, the degree of the curve a point on it draws, from a random complex line, and the number of finite points where that curve meets a line through the circular point I, x + iy = c, and one through J, x − iy = c. The difference is how many times the curve passes through that circular point. Four-bar, crank: degree 2, 1 and 1 finite, circularity 1; four-bar, coupler: degree 6, 3 and 3 finite, circularity 3; four-bar, rocker: degree 2, 1 and 1 finite, circularity 1; Watt six-bar, coupler: degree 6, 3 and 3 finite, circularity 3; Watt six-bar, second coupler: degree 6, 3 and 3 finite, circularity 3; Watt six-bar, output: degree 2, 1 and 1 finite, circularity 1; Stephenson six-bar, coupler: degree 6, 3 and 3 finite, circularity 3; Stephenson six-bar, arm: degree 18, 9 and 9 finite, circularity 9; Stephenson six-bar, output: degree 2, 1 and 1 finite, circularity 1; slider-crank, crank: degree 2, 1 and 1 finite, circularity 1; slider-crank, coupler: degree 4, 3 and 3 finite, circularity 1; elliptic trammel, rod: degree 2, 2 and 2 finite, circularity 0. Every body of the three machines built from pins alone has circularity exactly half its degree; the slider-crank's coupler curve and the trammel's ellipse do not.

Nine times through each circular point

A line through a circular point meets a curve at that point once for every time the curve passes through it, so counting its finite meetings measures how often, with no equation. The Stephenson six-bar's arm curve, degree eighteen, meets such lines in nine finite points: it passes nine times through each circular point. Every curve drawn by a body of a machine built from pins alone does this at exactly half its degree; a slide breaks it.

algebra · Algebra Six coupler points of one slider-crank: three at other distances from the crank pin, three exactly a rod away. A slider-crank with a crank of 1 and a rod of 3 on a slide through the crank's pivot, drawn at one position with the closed curves six points of its rod trace over both assemblies. A point is given as (u, v) in the rod's own units — u along the rod from the crank pin, v across it. On the left (0.4, 0.5), (−0.3, 0.2), (1.2, −0.6): their distances from the crank pin are 0.64, 0.36, 1.34 rods. On the right (0.6, 0.8), (0, 1), (−0.8, 0.6), each exactly one rod from the crank pin, as far as the slider pin is. All six are quartics, all six are bounded — no real branch runs off the page — and nothing in the drawing tells the two panels apart. The difference is at infinity.

Where a slide puts the rest of the degree

A slider-crank's connecting rod draws a quartic that passes once through each circular point, which leaves two of its four meetings with the line at infinity unaccounted for. They are not along the slide. A point u along the rod and v across it sends them to the complex slopes [2v ± i(1 − u² − v²)] / [(1 + u)² + v²], whatever the crank, rod or offset — confirmed by slicing and by the fitted equation — and they are real only for points exactly a rod's length from the crank pin, where they merge into one direction at half the point's angle.

algebra · Algebra

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

BezoutCircular pointsDegreeDouble pointGough platformPolynomial systemSlider-crankWitness setComplex solutionComputational costDirect kinematicsGenus

All concepts