Wheelbase — where it appears
Named by 7 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The path a towed wheel takes
A towed axle obeys one line: roll along your own heading, and stay attached. Nothing tells it to keep its distance from the hitch and it keeps it to 10⁻¹³ anyway, it settles onto a circle of exactly √(R² − L²), and the residual against that is not the integrator — it is the difference between a circle and the polygon it was sampled as, and it falls by four when the sampling doubles.
Which way did the bicycle go
Two tyre tracks in mud, and a question with a definite answer. The rear wheel is towed, so its tangent extended forward by the wheelbase must land on the front wheel's track — and it does, to 0.13 mm one way round and 447 mm the other. The test needs neither the wheelbase nor the direction of travel, and it returns both.
Every axis through one point
Bolt several rolling wheels to one rigid body and they impose one condition between them: every axle line must pass through a single point. The familiar steering formula falls out of it as a consequence rather than being quoted — cot δₒ − cot δᵢ = 0.574074 at a turn of six metres, of eight, of twelve and of twenty, on a track of 1.55 m and a wheelbase of 2.7.
A wheel that cannot report its radius
Rolling relates a wheel's turning to a vehicle's travelling, and the relation has a length in it. So a rolling constraint is the one place in these essays where an angle measurement does carry a size — and the size it carries is the one thing a vehicle's own odometry can never separate from its wheelbase.
What a wheel counts on a rough road
An odometer counts a wheel's turns and multiplies by its radius, and on a flat road that is the distance travelled. On a rough road it is not, and it is not the road's length either. It is the length of the path the wheel's centre follows — exactly, because the contact is the wheel's instantaneous centre. A wheel smaller than the road's tightest dip rolls over all of it and counts the road's full length; a larger one bridges the dips, pivots over the crests, and counts less, falling towards the true distance as λ³/24(R + ρ)². On a road 2.4% longer than its wavelength, a 50 mm wheel overcounts by 2.4% and a 2.4 m one by 0.03%.
A second wheel cannot correct the first
A wheel on a rough road counts the length of its centre's path, not the distance travelled. Put two on one rigid frame and average them, and the error does not shrink at any wheelbase: both centres run on the same curve, fixed by the road and the wheel's size, and each wavelength of travel carries each of them once round it. A half-wavelength wheelbase smooths the count's ripple and rocks the frame instead. What does work is two wheels of different sizes. A bridging wheel's error falls as the inverse square of its radius, so two radii measure their own error: wheels of 0.6 and 1.2 m that overcount by 0.339% and 0.099% extrapolate to 0.018%, knowing nothing about the road.
A real road sets its own power
On a road of one sine, a wheel's overcount falls as the inverse square of its radius, and two wheels extrapolate it away. A real road is a spectrum. Over the band road standards describe, every wheel smaller than the road's tightest trough — about a metre and a half on an average road — counts the road's whole length, and its size makes no difference at all. With the texture below that band, bigger wheels do bridge more, but the overcount falls as the two-thirds power of the radius, a power the road's spectrum sets: 2(3 − w)/(5 − w) for a spectrum falling as n^−w. The inverse-square recipe removes a sixth of the error.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Rolling constraintOff-trackingSecond orderTurning radiusApproximationNonholonomicScale invarianceTowed axleTractrixTwistAckermannClosed form