Bricard's linkage — where it appears
Named by 3 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Also named here as paradoxical mechanism — the same set of essays touches all of them, so they are one junction rather than several.
Two ways to be overconstrained
A planar four-bar and Bennett's four-bar report the same redundancy, the same rank and the same wrong count. One of them is overconstrained at every set of link lengths; the other at exactly one ratio and nowhere near it. The difference is not in any of the numbers so far — but it is measurable, and the measurement is an angle.
Compose two positions and see where you land
Take two configurations a mechanism actually reaches, compose the displacements that got it there, and ask what kind of thing the result is. A planar four-bar lands inside planar motion, to 4 × 10⁻¹⁶. Sarrus lands on its own line. Bennett's linkage lands three tenths of a radian outside the four dimensions its own displacements occupy — a one-freedom motion that generates all six.
A name for each overconstraint
The spatial field separated subgroup overconstraint from paradoxical by measuring how far a mechanism's screw system turns: 2 × 10⁻⁶ degrees against 89. That is a verdict without a name. Closing the logarithms of the reached displacements under the bracket gives the same verdict and says which group — planar, spherical, a translation — and for Bennett's linkage it says six.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Bennett's linkageDisplacement subgroupMobilityOverconstraintParadoxical mechanismScrew systemLie bracketPrincipal angleRankSubalgebraConstraintCouple