Coupler point — where it appears
Named by 4 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The solver was refusing a quarter of the sweep
Four numbers in this site's Jacobian had the wrong sign, from the foundation phase until now. Every picture it ever drew was correct, because a wrong derivative does not move a converged answer — it just makes Newton crawl, until the stall rule declares the position unreachable. The symptom was a sweep quietly returning fewer frames than it asked for, and no gate in the fleet has a rule against that.
A ruler and a protractor
What a measurement recovers is decided by the units of its readings. An angle is dimensionless and cannot see a size; a position is not and can. And putting both instruments on one machine recovers no more parameters than the better of them alone — it recovers the same ones six times better conditioned.
The area a coupler point encloses
Trace a point on the line through a crank-rocker's two moving pins and the region its curve encloses has area (1 − u)πa²: the crank pin's own circle, scaled by how far along the line the point sits. No ground, coupler or rocker length appears in it. Four machines that share only a crank enclose 2.199115 each, to 3 × 10⁻¹⁴.
A parameter the model has not got
The machine's tracing point is 0.198 units from where the model says it is, and the model has only four lengths with which to say so. It absorbs the discrepancy: the error over the measured half-turn falls by a factor of thirty-three, the error over the other half falls by twenty-one, and the rocker comes back eight per cent short.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
CalibrationIdentification jacobianScale invarianceAssembly branchCoupler curveCrank-rockerFinite differenceGrashof's conditionHolditch theoremIdentifiableJacobianKinematic solve