Machine Kinematics
solved, then drawn
Concept

Pose — where it appears

The position and orientation of a part taken together, as one point of a space with three coordinates in the plane and six in space. A hold makes the set of poses a part may occupy finite and a clearance gives that set a size, so the two questions are the same one asked at two scales.

Named by 6 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Three shortest paths. The tool's route between the same two poses, under three interpolations. The straight one is position interpolated along a line with the rotation carried separately, which is what most controllers do. The screw path is the single turn about a single axis that Chasles's theorem says takes any pose to any other — the only one of the three that mentions no coordinate system — and it is 18.0% longer. The joint-space path is what the arm does when nobody asks for anything in particular, and it is 26.8% longer again. The screw axis itself is drawn: pitch -0.096 m per radian.

The distance between two poses

Ask an arm to take the shortest route between two poses and three reasonable definitions give three different paths, of lengths 1.223, 1.443 and 1.550 metres. The disagreement is not numerical. There is no distance between two rigid poses until somebody chooses a length to measure a radian in, and on this arm the choice changes which of two poses is nearer at 74.5 millimetres.

serial · Serial A 4-sided bar, and the 13.6% it is out by. 3 flat jaws advancing together on a regular 4-sided bar of unit circumradius, with the bar turned 10.3° from square. The dashed circle is the axis the chuck is turning about and the marked point is where the bar's own centre has ended up: 0.13567 of a circumradius away. The arithmetic is one line — the jaws touch when c·u_k + h(u_k) = d, three unit vectors at 120° satisfy Σ u u ᵀ = 3/2 I, and so c = −⅔ Σ h(u_k) u_k — and it says that the offset vanishes exactly when the bar's own support function is unchanged by a 120° turn. Round, triangular, hexagonal, nine- and twelve-sided bars centre at any orientation; everything else does not, and by an amount that depends on how it happened to go in. Checked here against a linear program that closes the jaws without knowing the identity. positioned by solving, not by drawing.

Where the jaws put it

Three jaws closing on a bar put its axis at −⅔ Σ h(u_k) u_k, which vanishes exactly when the section's support function is unchanged by a 120° turn. So a three-jaw chuck centres round, triangular and hexagonal stock perfectly and a square bar by up to 17.3 per cent of its own circumradius — and the workshop rule about symmetry that predicts this is wrong, because a six-jaw chuck centres a square.

holding · Restraint The pose set is finite exactly when the part is held. Two arrangements, both with 0.06 of clearance on every contact, with the set of positions the part's centre may occupy drawn to scale. The one on the left holds: its pose set is a small bounded polyhedron, and every dimension of it is proportional to the clearance. The one on the right does not: its pose set runs off the page in the direction the part slides out of the vee, and giving the contacts a tighter tolerance narrows the box without ever closing that direction. A tolerance cannot buy a hold. The clearance decides how big a finite pose set is and the arrangement decides whether it is finite, and the second question has to be settled first because no amount of the first will settle it.

Held is not located

Back every obstacle off by a clearance and the permitted poses become a polyhedron — bounded exactly when the arrangement is a hold, since an unbounded direction of it would be a ray of the escape cone. So whether a part is held is whether its pose set is finite, the clearance is what gives that set a size, and the two questions have to be settled in that order because no tolerance settles the first.

holding · Restraint Where a tilted platform is still singular. A slice of the workspace at height 2.4, at the dead yaw and 3° of tilt, with each position shaded by how well the platform is held there — dark where the six legs are nearly dependent and pale where they are not. Level, this whole square would be uniformly dark. Tilted, the dark places are a curve through it, which is what an ordinary direct singularity looks like on a slice. Driving a search downhill from forty-eight starts reaches a smallest singular value of 0.00e+0, so the locus is a singularity rather than a shallow valley.

Tilted, near the dead yaw

A paired Gough platform held level is singular at one yaw wherever it stands. Tilt it and that stops being true — the six moments are no longer equal and the home position is held. It is a poor rescue: the rise is quadratic in the tilt, so a degree buys a sixty-fourth of what eight degrees buys, and what the tilt actually does is not remove the singularity but turn it into a surface through the workspace.

parallel · Parallel Where in the workspace each yaw is singular, once the platform tilts. A horizontal slice of the workspace at height 2.4, for the paired platform with its pairs rotated 0° and tilted 1° about an axis 0° from x (the arrow). Each square is shaded by the yaw, measured from the dead yaw 90°, at which that position is singular — found as the root of the six leg screws' determinant — blue where it is below the dead yaw and orange above, deepest at ±0.208°. Level, every position would be singular at the dead yaw exactly. Tilted, the singular yaw is a plane over the slice: over the whole workspace, the yaw times the height fits a·x + b·y to 0.7% of its spread, and the dashed line is where it is nought. The plane's slope turns with the tilt axis. Dragging turns the axis.

The dead yaw opens into a wedge

A paired Gough platform held level is singular everywhere at one yaw and nowhere a quarter of a degree either side of it. Tilt it and each position of the workspace becomes singular at its own yaw, displaced from the dead one in proportion to the tilt and to the position's horizontal offset over its height. So the orientations that put a singularity somewhere in the workspace are not a surface through the dead yaw but a wedge standing on it, about a quarter of a degree of yaw wide on each side for every degree of tilt — and the rotation between the pairs, which chooses where the dead yaw is, barely changes how much room it needs.

parallel · Parallel The singular set cuts the workspace's poses in two, and every path across it meets it. A slice of the paired Gough platform's poses, tilted 2° about x: the yaw's offset from the dead yaw across, and the position along the workspace's low diagonal, from one corner at height 1.8 to the other, up. Each cell is shaded by the sign of the six leg screws' determinant; the line between the two shades is where it is nought, the singular set. Tilted, it leans: each position is singular at its own yaw, the low corners about 0.48° either side. Three paths from −2.5° to +2.5° are drawn, one held still, one moving, one wandering, and each meets the line: held at the middle, 1 crossing; moving corner to corner, 1 crossing; wandering, 1 crossing. No path from one shade to the other can avoid it.

No path across the dead yaw misses it

A paired Gough platform that has to turn from one side of its dead yaw to the other cannot be steered round the singularity by tilting, by moving, or by turning the long way. The six legs' determinant has one sign everywhere on one side and the other everywhere on the other, so every path passes a singular pose — two hundred random ones do, an odd number of times each. Tilt chooses only where the crossing happens and how briskly: a quarter quicker at best, and threefold slower if it is done by moving instead of turning.

parallel · Parallel

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Architecture singularityDesign ruleSingular valueSingularitythe Gough–Stewart platformWorkspaceFixtureForm closureLinear programReciprocal screwRepeatabilityScrew

All concepts