Machine Kinematics
solved, then drawn
Concept

Threshold — where it appears

A value of a parameter at which a mechanism's behaviour changes kind rather than degree. The interesting ones here are bisected from geometry rather than quoted, so that a formula can be checked against a measurement.

Named by 12 essays across 6 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Undercutting, either side of 17.10 teeth. Five gears, drawn whole and scaled to a common pitch circle so the tooth counts can be compared by counting them. The dedendum sits a fixed 1.25 modules below the pitch circle and the base circle sits at r·cos α, so as the tooth count falls the base circle rises relative to the root. Below N = 2/sin²α = 17.097 it rises above it, and the part of the flank between them lies where no involute exists — the cutter removes it. The familiar rule says seventeen; the exact figure is 17.10, so seventeen undercuts slightly and eighteen is the smallest count that does not. The teeth are not to a common scale, because at a common module the small gears would be unreadable.

Undercutting, and the seventeen-tooth rule

Below a certain tooth count a standard cutter eats into the flank it is supposed to be forming. The count is quoted as seventeen. The formula gives 17.097, which means seventeen undercuts slightly and eighteen is the smallest that does not — the rounding went the convenient way.

gears · Tooth Two ways of adding four tolerances. The output band from ±0.01 on each of four lengths, combined two ways. The upper curve is worst case — every error at its extreme and conspiring — and the lower is root-sum-square, which treats the four as independent random errors. RSS is smaller everywhere, by between 1.42 and 1.95, and with four contributions the most it can ever be is √4 = 2. That factor is not a saving found in the geometry; it is bought with the assumption that the four errors are independent, and one fixture that locates two of the holes takes it straight back.

Worst case and the square root

Four tolerances can be added as a straight sum or as a root-sum-square, and the second is smaller by between 1.42 and 1.96 through this linkage's cycle. The ceiling is √4 = 2 and no geometry can beat it. That factor is not found in the mechanism — it is bought entirely with an assumption of independence, and one fixture that locates two holes takes it straight back.

practice · Tolerance What each loop's constraint system is made of. For each mechanism: the order of the screw system its joints span, the order of the reciprocal system — the wrenches it carries without moving, which is always six minus the first — and what those wrenches are. A planar four-bar carries one force and two couples; a mechanism whose motion lies in no subgroup carries screws of finite pitch instead, and 2 of these 6 do.

What a mechanism cannot do

A mechanism's freedoms are a subspace of screw space. Everything orthogonal to that subspace under the reciprocal product is a force the mechanism carries without moving — so the constraints are not a separate thing to be worked out, they are what is left, and one matrix gives both.

spatial · Spatial Free in every direction, and it cannot get out. A disc of radius 1 among 3 point obstacles on a circle of radius 1.100. The shaded discs are the obstacles grown by the part's own radius, which is what the part's centre may not enter — the configuration space, and for a round part it is the plane itself. The part is caged when those grown discs overlap enough to close a ring around it, which happens below R = 1/sin(π/3) = 1.154701, and here it does. At every configuration inside the cage the part is free. The three normals all point at its centre, the rank of its rows is two, the escape cone is a whole line, and none of that has anything to do with whether it can leave. A hold is a statement about velocities at one configuration; a cage is a statement about where a finite motion can go, and the second does not follow from the first in either direction. positioned by solving, not by drawing.

Free at every instant and going nowhere

Three points on a circle of 1.1 radii around a unit disc leave it free in every direction at every configuration — rank two, margin nought, the whole plane of centres shaded — and it cannot get out. The threshold is 1/sin(π/n), which is 1.154701 for three, and a flood fill of the free space agrees with the formula at every radius sampled.

holding · Restraint Tolerancing the holes rather than the lengths. The output band from ±0.01, computed on the four link lengths and then on the features those lengths are derived from. The ground length is the distance between two frame holes, and what happens to it depends entirely on how they were made: located separately, two independent errors combine to √2 times one and the lengths-only answer is optimistic by 11%; bored in one setup, the common part of the machine's error cancels out of the distance between them and the lengths-only answer is pessimistic by 34%. Neither is a correction to apply; it is a question for the machine shop. The sensitivity can be computed; the answer cannot.

Tolerancing the holes

A drawing does not tolerance link lengths. It tolerances holes, and the lengths are derived from them — so what a length's tolerance really means depends on whether its two holes were bored in one setup. Located separately, a lengths-only stack-up is optimistic by 11%; bored together, it is pessimistic by 34%. Neither is a correction to apply blind.

practice · Tolerance One tooth count, three pressure angles. A 20-tooth gear cut at 14.5°, 20°, 25°, drawn at a common pitch radius and overlaid on its own pitch and base circles. The three teeth have the same thickness at the pitch circle — that is what the standard fixes — and differ everywhere else: a coarser pressure angle puts the base circle lower and leans the flank over, so the tooth gains metal where it is held and loses it where it reaches: thicknesses at the base circle run 1.628, 1.756, 1.967 modules and at the tip 0.866, 0.695, 0.510. Those two run opposite ways, and the second of them ends at a hard stop — a tooth whose tip thickness reaches zero has come to a point and cannot be cut.

The angle the standard left free

Involute geometry fixes the tooth curve and leaves one number open. Raising it buys smaller pinions and spends contact ratio, monotonically and in opposite directions, so there is no angle that is best at both — and the familiar twenty degrees is a choice with a date on it rather than an optimum.

gears · Tooth Two cones, 20 teeth and 40, at 90°. The axial section, which is where every bevel quantity is read. Two cones share an apex and roll on one another along the element drawn heavy; their half-angles are 26.57° and 63.43°, adding to the shaft angle, and the ratio of their sines is the tooth-count ratio exactly. The dashed arc is the sphere of radius 22.36 on which a bevel tooth's profile actually lies. The two short lines perpendicular to the common element are the back cones; each is heading for its own axis at a distance r/cos δ from the pitch circle — 11.18 and 44.72 — and that distance is the pitch radius of the spur gear the tooth is really cut to. Both back cones lie on one line, because there is only one perpendicular to the pitch element at that point, and the two heavy stubs straddling it are the two teeth — each one addendum out from the pitch circle and 1.25 in.

A tooth that lives on a sphere

Every tooth in this field so far has been a curve in a plane, forced by the law of gearing and exact. A bevel tooth's profile lies on a sphere, no piece of a sphere flattens without stretching, and so the shape a bevel gear is actually cut to is an approximation — the only one in the field.

gears · Tooth 24 teeth inside 72. An internal pair, drawn from the same involute the external pairs are drawn from. Three things are different and they are one difference. The centre distance is 24.0 — the difference of the pitch radii rather than their sum. Both base tangency points lie on the same side of the line of action, so the pitch point falls outside the segment between them rather than inside it. And the contact ratio is 1.931 against the external pair's 1.707, because the annulus's tip circle cuts the line on the far side of its own tangency and lengthens the contact path instead of shortening it. The pinion turns the same way as the annulus, which no external pair ever does.

The mesh with one curvature reversed

Turn an annulus's teeth inward and the same involute law produces a different machine: a centre distance that is a difference, two base tangencies on one side of the line of action, more contact than an external pair carries, and three separate floors on the tooth counts, all of them the same statement about where an involute stops existing.

gears · Tooth The smallest springs that balance the lamp, and the one that is not needed. The tilting-head desk lamp with one parallelogram, its springs of no free length placed to make the total of their peak pulls over the working range least, inside an outline of brackets 0.15 m high, attachment points 0.08 m past the wrist and along the head's 0.15 m. Peak pulls 22.7, 0.0, 23.2, 17.5 N (lower arm, upper arm, elbow bracket to head, wrist), 63.4 N in all and 23.2 at most. The head spring meets the head at 0.0615 m, the threshold, and the upper arm's spring has no stiffness at all: it is left out.

The lamp needs three springs

A desk lamp with a tilting head, balanced exactly with springs of no free length, was built with four springs whose peak pulls add to 162 N. Searched over every attachment point inside the same outline, the least total is 63.4 N, and it is reached with three: the head spring hung at the threshold where the upper arm's spring stops being needed, 77% of the way to the head's centre of mass. Beyond the threshold a second spring is the first one split in two, and splitting a spring never makes it smaller. A design with no parallelogram and six springs is never close: 213 N at its best.

applied · Fourbar Re-chosen attachment points buy back a third of the tilt at four times the springs. The tilting-head lamp with one parallelogram and the smallest springs of the earlier essay. Every spring 2 cm free and every attachment point re-chosen for the least worst moment, all springs still pulling: 0.0611 N·m, a third less, with peak pulls 29.6, 0.0, 41.6, 195.1 N (lower arm, upper arm, elbow bracket to head, wrist), 266.3 N in all. The upper arm's spring is dotted where it has no stiffness.

A free length is absorbed where the springs attach

Give every spring of the smallest balanced desk lamp 2 cm of free length and refit the stiffnesses, and the lamp is left with 0.093 N·m of unbalance, growing in exact proportion to the free length. The spare fourth spring that ideal springs had no use for recovers under three per cent of it, and moving the head spring beyond the threshold only makes it worse. What absorbs a free length is a spring whose length barely changes. Re-chosen attachment points buy back a third of the unbalance that way, and pay for it with four times the pull.

applied · Fourbar The smallest springs that balance the lamp, and the one that is not needed. The tilting-head desk lamp with one parallelogram, its springs of no free length placed to make the total of their peak pulls over the working range least, inside an outline of brackets 0.15 m high, attachment points 0.08 m past the wrist and along the head's 0.15 m. Peak pulls 22.7, 0.0, 23.2, 17.5 N (lower arm, upper arm, elbow bracket to head, wrist), 63.4 N in all and 23.2 at most. The head spring meets the head at 0.0615 m, the threshold, and the upper arm's spring has no stiffness at all: it is left out.

Six things a balancing spring is not

More springs share the load, a spring that must push wants a compression spring, a stiffer spring balances better, a refitted stiffness repairs a free length, least squares finds the balance, and the best spring is one of no free length. Six things said about springs that balance a mechanism, each the natural reading of something true, each answered by a number the essays on the desk lamp and the rocking slide measured. They fail the same way. Each treats the spring as the thing to be sized, and a balance is decided first by where the spring is hung and how its error is judged.

wrong · Misconception Allowed 100 newtons, the lamp spends them on its attachment points. The tilting-head lamp with one parallelogram, every spring 2 cm free, its attachment points chosen inside the earlier outline for the least worst moment on any joint with the springs' peak pulls capped at 100 N in total. Worst moment 0.0620 N·m; peak pulls 22.5, 28.7, 13.9, 34.9 N (lower arm, upper arm, elbow bracket to head, wrist), 100.0 N in all. Each spring's zigzag is drawn heavier the harder it pulls, and dotted where it pulls less than half a newton.

The first pull goes to the spring the lamp did without

Give every spring of the balanced desk lamp 2 cm of free length and let it have more pull, and the worst moment it is left with falls from 0.086 N·m at 62 N to 0.052 at 227 N, the most any attachment points inside the outline can do. Half of that improvement costs the first 18 newtons; the second half costs the next 147. Spent on stiffness alone, with the attachment points held, extra pull buys nothing at all. And the first place it goes is the upper arm's spring, the spare that ideal springs had no use for, hung lower on its bracket while the head spring moves out past the threshold. The wrist spring, which carried almost all of the earlier re-attached design's cost, takes the largest share only after 140 N.

applied · Fourbar

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Design ruleFour-barBase circleInvoluteParallelogramUndercuttingConstraintContact ratioJacobianLeast-squaresMinimaxAllocation

All concepts