Tooth — where it appears
Named by 3 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The gearset that could not be assembled
A planetary drawing shows a sun, a ring and three or four planets between them, and if the circles are the right sizes at the right stations it looks right. The condition that decides whether the second planet can actually be dropped in is arithmetic — the sun and ring teeth must add to a multiple of the planet count — and it appears in no drawing, at no scale, in any style.
Which tooth meets which
A tooth on a pinion does not meet every tooth on its wheel. It meets z₂ divided by the greatest common divisor of the two counts, and it meets the same ones for the whole life of the drive. On the default planetary used throughout — sun 24, planets 24 — a planet tooth touches exactly one sun tooth and never touches another, and nothing in the drawing says so.
A ratio that is a count
A compound epicyclic's reduction is a ratio of two integers, because it is a ratio of tooth counts — 2176/106 for the drive here, exact at every position and on every unit ever made. It is the only quoted number in this field that survives being measured, and it is fragile in a way exactness does not protect against: one tooth on one ring moves it by forty per cent.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
MeshDesign ruleEnumerationEpicyclicVelocity ratioAssembly conditionCentre distanceConditioningGear trainHunting toothMisconceptionPeriodicity