Trammel — where it appears
Named by 6 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The mechanism drops out
Every other field here is about a machine. This one is about the motion a machine makes — a plane sliding over a plane — and near any instant that motion is a handful of numbers with no linkage in them. Two mechanisms that agree on those numbers make the same motion, and one of them can always be thrown away.
Exact because two circles roll
Watt's straight line is straight to nine parts in a hundred and Chebyshev's to twelve. Here is one that is straight to nothing at all — no error term, no working range, no approximation anywhere — and the reason is that its two centrodes are circles, one rolling inside the other at exactly half its radius.
A second slide keeps only the rod
A slide turned a four-bar's rocker into a line and left one cognate, the slider-crank with its crank and rod exchanged. Turn the crank into a slide as well and the exchange stops producing a machine, since λ times a sliding pin's position is a vector that shrinks to nothing twice a turn. The cognates do not vanish; they multiply. Every double slider's ellipse is drawn by any two points of either of two rolling circles — a two-parameter family on each — and the one rotation left, the rod's, is carried by every one of them, with the original on one circle and against it on the other.
A third slide moves only through the crossing
Every point of a double slider's rolling circle runs on a line through the slides' crossing, so a rod can ride a third block on a third slide there, and a fourth and a fifth. The count gives nought, then minus one, then minus two; the rod turns freely every time, because each slide past the second is implied by the first two. Build the third slide slightly wrong and the count wins, in a way that depends on the error's kind: moved parallel, the rod turns freely inside the block's clearance and does not assemble outside it; turned by ε about the crossing, it moves only in two windows a turn, of 2·arcsin(c/(2r sin ε)) each, where the third pin passes through the crossing.
A fourth block can only take freedom away
A rod on a double slider can carry a third block on a third slide through the crossing and still turn, and a slide turned slightly wrong leaves it free only in two windows a turn. The hope was that a fourth block, at the point of the rolling circle opposite the third, would travel in opposition and cancel the error. It cannot, for two reasons. The opposite pin is the other end of a diameter: it runs on the perpendicular slide, a quarter of a turn out of phase, so its windows fall exactly between the third's. And whatever its place, a block only adds a condition the rod must also meet, so the rod's freedom is an intersection and can only shrink. With the double slider's own blocks exact, the third and the opposite fourth turned 0.0066 rad each lock the rod, where the third alone still moves at any error.
Fit every extra slide at one pose
A double slider's extra slide, turned slightly wrong, leaves its block free in a band of the slide centred on the point it was turned about, and the rod free in windows where the pin passes through that band. Turned about the crossing, a third and an opposite fourth block have their windows a quarter of a turn apart and lock the rod from 0.0066 rad. Set each slide through its own pin at one common pose of the rod and every error becomes a turn about the place its pin has then, so every window contains that pose and the rod can never lock, with two blocks or six. Each slide pivoted where it alone is freest does better while the errors are small and locks from between 0.02 and 0.05 rad, where the common pose 45° from either crossing comes within a tenth of the best pivots there are.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
CentrodeClearanceMobilityRedundant constraintGrübler's criterionInstantaneous centreClosed formCognate linkageConstraint jacobianCuspDesign ruleExact arithmetic