Watt's linkage — where it appears
Named by 4 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The straight-line problem
Before 1800 a long true flat surface was harder to make than almost anything else, so guiding a piston straight without a slide was worth solving. Watt's answer was an approximation. Measuring how good an approximation, over how much of the stroke, turns out to be a more interesting question than whether it is exact.
Peaucellier and the exact answer
Eighty years after Watt settled for an approximation, a French army officer found a linkage that draws an exactly straight line from pin joints alone. It works by inversion in a circle, the product it holds constant is measurable, and on this site it comes out straight to 10⁻¹⁶ of its span.
Sarrus, and the straight line that is exact
The planar answer to the straight-line problem took two hundred years and arrived as an inversion cell with eight bars. There is a six-bar answer that is also exact, that was published eleven years before Peaucellier's, and that works for a reason with nothing to do with inversion — it leaves the plane.
Seven lengths and a hundred corners
Nothing in a tolerance analysis is about four. A Watt six-bar has seven lengths, its corner enumeration is 128 mechanisms rather than 16, and the two routes still agree to a hundredth of a per cent — but the costs have separated — 142 solves against seven. At twenty parameters, which is an ordinary spatial mechanism, it is a million against twenty.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
ConstraintPeaucellier's cellStrokeApproximationChebyshev's linkageExactnessInversionStraight line mechanismAllocationConstraint jacobianCoupler curveDead centre