Peaucellier's cell — where it appears
Named by 3 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The straight-line problem
Before 1800 a long true flat surface was harder to make than almost anything else, so guiding a piston straight without a slide was worth solving. Watt's answer was an approximation. Measuring how good an approximation, over how much of the stroke, turns out to be a more interesting question than whether it is exact.
Peaucellier and the exact answer
Eighty years after Watt settled for an approximation, a French army officer found a linkage that draws an exactly straight line from pin joints alone. It works by inversion in a circle, the product it holds constant is measurable, and on this site it comes out straight to 10⁻¹⁶ of its span.
Sarrus, and the straight line that is exact
The planar answer to the straight-line problem took two hundred years and arrived as an inversion cell with eight bars. There is a six-bar answer that is also exact, that was published eleven years before Peaucellier's, and that works for a reason with nothing to do with inversion — it leaves the plane.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Watt's linkageApproximationChebyshev's linkageConstraintExactnessInversionStraight line mechanismStrokeCoupler curveDead centreEngineError curve