Machine Kinematics
solved, then drawn
Concept

Envelope — where it appears

The curve touching every member of a family of curves, which is what a cam profile is with respect to the roller that generates it. It has two definitions that share no arithmetic — the locus where a family's members are tangent, and the limit of the intersections of neighbouring members — and this site measures the gap between them.

Named by 27 essays across 6 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

One contact, and the point the normal has to pass through. Two wheels on fixed centres, turning in the ratio 24 : 36, with one flank of each drawn. The contact is found by solving n·(v₁ − v₂) = 0 along the first flank — the two velocities are formed from the two rotations and subtracted, and nothing in that calculation knows where the pitch point is. The pitch point, marked with a cross, is computed separately as the one place where the two bodies' material points have the same velocity. The common normal misses it by 8.44e-15 of a millimetre, which is the law of gearing arriving as a measurement rather than as an assumption. positioned by solving, not by drawing.

The second shape is not a choice

Two bodies on fixed centres, told to stay in contact. Give one of them a shape and the other one's shape is no longer available to be designed — it is the envelope of the first one's positions, there is exactly one of it, and one routine computes it for a gear, a cam and a rotary engine alike.

meshing · Meshing A flank nobody would draw, and the partner it forces. On the left, a driving flank made up on purpose: a rising curve with a nine-cycle wobble on it, chosen to be nothing in particular. On the right, in the driven wheel's frame, the shape that has to mate with it. There was a contact at all 121 sampled positions and the worst residual of the meshing equation was 3.13e-10. Conjugate action does not single out the involute — every profile has a partner that holds the ratio exactly, and the reasons for preferring one tooth form over another are all somewhere else. Generating back the other way returns the original flank to 2.33e-5 mm over 61 points. positioned by solving, not by drawing.

Any shape has a partner

Conjugate action does not pick out the involute. Hand the construction a flank invented on purpose to be nothing in particular and it returns a mate that holds the ratio exactly — so the question a tooth form answers is not whether it can transmit motion, and every real reason for choosing one is somewhere else.

meshing · Meshing A straight edge cutting a 24-tooth wheel. The rack's flanks are straight lines and its pitch line rolls on the wheel's pitch circle without slipping — 48 mm of travel per radian, which is the only number in the whole process. The dots are the contacts the meshing equation has returned so far, and they are the flank being cut: an involute, produced by a tool that has no curve anywhere on it. The corner of the rack traces the fillet below, which is a different curve for a different reason — a corner is a point, and a point has no envelope but its own path. positioned by solving, not by drawing.

The tool is the definition

There is no curve anywhere on the cutter that makes an involute gear. It is a straight edge, dragged past a turning blank, and the involute is what the motion leaves behind — along with a fillet that is a corner's path, a contact locus that comes out a straight line, and a base circle that is measured rather than drawn.

meshing · Meshing A cam profile is an envelope, and its curvature obeys the same law. The dashed curve is the pitch curve — where the roller's centre travels — and the solid one is the surface that has to be cut, which is the pitch curve offset inward by the roller radius. That offset is the conjugate law of this field with one centre of curvature sent to infinity, and it says ρ_cut = ρ_pitch − r. Measured off the drawn polyline at six angles, the worst departure is 4.8e-7: at 95° the pitch curve has radius 29.52 and the cut profile 21.52, against 21.52 predicted. It is also why undercutting is a curvature condition rather than an accident: where ρ_pitch falls below the roller radius the offset turns itself inside out.

A profile is an envelope

A cam's surface is not a curve somebody drew. It is the envelope of the roller as the roller runs round the pitch curve, and its curvature is the pitch curve's less the roller radius — a law that the cam calculations here were breaking for six months, in the one curve that gets manufactured and the only one no check looked at.

cams · Cam A cam is the envelope of a roller. The follower's roller drawn in the cam's frame at 15 angles of the cam: the roller slides in a straight guide and the cam turns under it, so from the cam's point of view the roller travels round it on a path set by the lift law. The cam's surface is the envelope of those circles — the same computation as a rack generating a tooth, with a circle instead of a straight edge and a lift law instead of a rolling condition. The cams field builds the same surface by offsetting the roller-centre path inward by the roller radius, and the two agree to 4.1e-4 mm. positioned by solving, not by drawing.

A cam is a conjugate pair

A cam is built by offsetting the path of the follower's centre inward by the roller radius. It can also be built by asking what shape stays in contact with a circle that slides in a stated way — the same computation that cuts a gear tooth — and the two surfaces agree to sixteen millionths of a millimetre.

cams · Cam A flat follower needs a face, and how wide is not a matter of taste. The cam profile the cycloidal programme produces on a base circle of 30, at 70° of rotation, with the follower's face across the top and the contact marked. The contact is not on the follower's axis: it sits at ds/dθ from it, so it wanders sideways as the cam turns and the face has to reach from the most negative value of that to the most positive. Here that is 19.099 — measured off the drawn profile as 19.099, the two routes agreeing to 1.0e-16. A face cut to the lift, or to the base circle, or to whatever looked right, is a face the cam runs off.

A follower needs a face

A flat-faced follower does not touch the cam on its own axis. The contact wanders sideways as the cam turns, by exactly ds/dθ, and a face cut to the lift or to the base circle or to whatever looked right is a face the cam runs off.

cams · Cam The shape is what the demanded arm implies. A strand leaving a convex body runs along a tangent, so the only thing about the body the strand can feel is the perpendicular distance from the axis to that tangent — the shape's support function h(ψ). Ask for a rate and you have asked for h, because turning the body by dψ pays out h dψ; the shape then comes back from h with no solve at all, as h(ψ)û + h′(ψ)û⊥. This one was asked for h₀(1 + 0.3 cos 2ψ) with h₀ = 34 mm. The strand drawn here leaves the axis at a perpendicular distance of 24.1286 mm, which is what the demand asks for at this angle. positioned by solving, not by drawing.

The drum that is not round

The only thing about a body a strand can feel is the perpendicular distance from the axis to the tangent it leaves along. Ask for a rate and you have asked for that distance at every angle — and the shape comes back from it with no solve at all, unless the demand exceeds 1/(n²−1), at which point there is no shape.

strands · Strand A rotor that was not drawn, at 52° of shaft. The housing is an epitrochoid — the only shape here that was written down — and the rotor is the envelope of it, seen from a body that turns at a third of the shaft's rate about a centre orbiting at the eccentricity. Nothing about the rotor was chosen. Its three apexes come out at radius 100.000000, which is the generating radius R exactly, at 0° and ±120°; the middle of each flank comes closest to the centre at 72.0000, which is R − 2e. The apexes are the only part of the rotor that touches the housing, which is why a rotary engine's sealing problem is three lines rather than a ring. positioned by solving, not by drawing.

A rotor nobody drew

The rotor of a rotary engine has three corners, three flanks and one job: to stay in contact with a housing while turning at a third of the shaft's speed about a centre that orbits. Given the housing and that motion, the rotor is not designed. It is computed, corners and all, by the routine that cuts a gear tooth.

meshing · Meshing The rotor is not a Reuleaux triangle. The generated rotor, with the Reuleaux triangle through the same three apexes drawn over it — three circular arcs, each centred on the opposite corner. They part company by 1.21 mm on a rotor of generating radius 100, and the flank is the one that is right: it is the envelope of the housing, and a Reuleaux flank would foul the wall. The measurement that cannot be argued with is the width. A Reuleaux triangle has the same width in every direction — that is what it is for — and this rotor's runs from 150.0 to 174.1, a spread of 16 per cent. positioned by solving, not by drawing.

Six things a shape is not

A rotor that is not a Reuleaux triangle, teeth that are not the same shape as each other, a fillet that is not an arc, a mesh that does not roll, a conjugate pair that cannot be built and a tooth form that was not deduced. Six claims in circulation, each with the number that kills it.

wrong · Misconception Three chambers, 15,257 mm² between them. Each chamber is bounded by one flank of the rotor and the arc of housing between the two apexes that seal it, so its area is a polygon integral over two curves that are both known exactly. At this shaft angle they are 6309, 1147, 7801 mm². They add to 15257, and the housing's area less the rotor's is 15258 — a number that cannot depend on where the rotor is, and does not, to 9.2e-6 of itself. The engine's displacement is that constant shared out differently, and the three chambers are one chamber counted at three phases of the same cycle. positioned by solving, not by drawing.

Three chambers and a constant

A rotor with three corners divides its housing into three chambers, and as the shaft turns they trade area: one grows exactly as fast as the other two shrink. The total does not move — and the fact that it does not is a measurement of whether the corners are actually touching the wall.

meshing · Meshing Eleven lobes from twelve pins, at 46° of eccentric. The pins are circles and the disc is their envelope. One turn of the eccentric moves the disc back by one lobe pitch — a reduction of 11 : 1 from a ring, a disc and an offset bearing, with no gear teeth anywhere — and the profile's 11 lobes are counted off the generated curve rather than put there. The roots sit at 50.00 mm and the tips at 60.00, which are R − r ∓ e: the eccentricity is the lobe height, twice over. positioned by solving, not by drawing.

Eleven lobes from twelve pins

A ring of round pins, a disc on an eccentric, and a reduction of eleven to one with no gear teeth anywhere. The disc's profile is not designed: one pin generates one lobe of it, the other ten lobes are the same curve, and the count that decides the ratio is a count of lobes on a shape nobody drew.

meshing · Meshing A flat face on a base circle of 30, where the profile bends tightest. The cycloidal programme — rise 10 over 120°, return over 120° — cut for a flat-faced follower on a base circle of 30, turned to 212.4°, where the profile's radius of curvature is smallest. The contact sits −5.37 from the follower's axis, which is ds/dθ, and the dashed circle is the one that fits the profile there: R₀ + s + s″ = 24.668, and 24.668 fitted through the drawn curve. The face's pressure angle is zero at every angle. What it needs instead is for that radius to stay positive, and it does so on every base circle above 5.332.

A flat face asks for a convex cam

A flat-faced follower is pushed at right angles to its face, so its pressure angle is zero at every angle and the constraint that sizes a roller's cam disappears. What replaces it is convexity: the profile's radius at the contact is R₀ + s + s″, and a base circle below 5.332 leaves a cycloidal cam with a hollow the face cannot reach — held 0.446 high on a base of 2.

cams · Cam What is left of a 12-tooth flank. The flank the rack generated on a 12-tooth wheel, with every point tested against the cutter at every other position of the cut. The pale dots survive; the dark ones are inside the cutter at some later instant and are not on the finished tooth — 39 of 203 of them, the deepest by 5.19e-2 mm. Undercutting is not a shape, it is a removal: the same corner that leaves the fillet comes back for flank the straight edge had already generated, and what is lost is the part of the involute nearest the base circle, which is exactly the part the mating wheel's tip needs. Drag to change the tooth count. positioned by solving, not by drawing.

The cutter takes back the tooth

Undercutting is usually explained as a shape: a tooth with a waist in it. It is better understood as an event — the corner that leaves the fillet comes back through flank the straight edge has already generated — and seen that way the threshold at seventeen teeth is a comparison of two measured points that passes through zero.

meshing · Meshing The string is the radius. An involute is generated by unwinding a taut string from the base circle, and the taut string is the flank's normal — so the point where it leaves the base circle is the centre of curvature and the string's length is the radius. At a flank radius r that length is √(r² − r_b²), and the dashed curve is that expression. The dots are the curvature of the polyline this site actually draws, measured by circumcircle through consecutive points, over 324 of them. Worst relative disagreement 1.9e-6. At the base circle the radius of curvature is zero, which is why a flank cut below it is not an involute and why undercutting removes exactly that part.

Two flanks, one law

At a gear mesh the two tooth flanks are conjugate profiles, the pitch point is the pole of their relative motion, and their radii of curvature are tied to each other rather than free. Each flank's radius varies fourfold across the mesh and the sum of the two does not vary at all.

gears · Tooth The ratio survives; the continuity does not. An involute pair holds its ratio at any centre distance, and that is not the same as working at any centre distance. The contact ratio — the length of the contact path divided by the base pitch, which counts how many pairs of teeth are engaged at once — starts at 1.647 for this 24 : 36 pair and falls as the shafts move apart, because the useful part of the line of action is bounded by the two tip circles. It reaches one at 2.82 mm, and below one a pair of teeth lets go before the next has picked up: the drive stops being continuous and becomes a series of arrivals. That is the real limit on the involute's indifference, and it is a limit on the teeth rather than on the tooth form.

Where two shapes stop touching

A conjugate pair is exact at every instant it has a contact. It does not have one for ever: a profile is an arc rather than a curve, and both ends of that arc are somebody's decision — which is why the useful question about a pair of shapes is not whether they mesh but for how long.

meshing · Meshing Two identical rotors in mesh, and the one place they touch. Two rotors, each with 2 cycloidal lobes on a pitch circle of radius 50, on centres 100 apart and turning at the same speed in opposite senses, drawn with the first turned −20°. Each rotor's roots were computed from its tips, and the mate is the same rotor turned. At this position they touch at one point, on the first rotor's tip, and the common normal there misses the pitch point by 2.2 × 10⁻¹⁰. The contact sits on the describing circle tangent to both pitch circles, within 8.5 × 10⁻¹⁰, so the normal is the chord from the pitch point to it. The normal's moment arm about the mate's shaft is 32.14, positive when the contact turns the mate forward.

Rotors that mesh and cannot drive each other

Two identical lobed rotors on shafts turning one to one are each other's conjugate: give half of a lobe and the meshing equation computes the other half so exactly that the rotor is its own mate. The pair holds its ratio at every instant and still cannot drive itself, because the one contact between them pushes the driven rotor backwards for exactly half of every turn.

meshing · Meshing Two rotors cut undersize, and the gap that is their seal. The conjugate pair at three positions of its turn, each rotor cut 3 undersize — its boundary moved that far inward along its own normal, with the full-size outline dashed behind it. At full size the two are in contact at every angle, so cutting both back by 3 leaves exactly 6.0 between them wherever they were touching. Measured over a whole lobe pitch the gap runs from 5.9965 to 6.0000 against a prediction of 6, a worst departure of 3.46e-3.

The clearance that is the seal

Two rotors that are each other's conjugates touch at every angle of their turn, so cutting both back by the same amount leaves exactly twice it between them, everywhere. Open the shafts by the same amount instead and the gap runs from four per cent of it to all of it. And a pair that is not conjugate has no seal to cut: over one lobe pitch it swings from two and a half units inside itself to two and a third apart.

meshing · Meshing A flat face on a swinging arm, and the cam it asks for. The cam a flat-faced follower needs when its face is carried on an arm pivoted 300 from the cam's centre, with a base circle of 20 and a lift of 20, drawn in the cam's own frame at three cam angles. The heavy line is the face, the dashed line is the perpendicular from the cam's centre to it, and the dot is the contact. Its distance from the foot of that perpendicular is the offset, which for a sliding face would be the programme's own velocity and here is a quantity with the arm in it. Over the turn it runs from -20.41 to 17.95, so the face must be 38.4 wide.

A flat face on an arm is worse

Carry a cam's roller on a swinging arm instead of a slide and the pressure angle improves — a long arm beats an offset. Carry a flat face on one and the opposite happens. The cam sees the sine of the follower's rotation rather than the rotation, and the distortion costs convexity: the smallest workable base circle rises from 10.66 on a slide to 28.68 at a pivot three base circles out, and below a certain arm length no base circle works at all.

cams · Cam The same arm with its face through the pivot and stood off it, each at its smallest convex cam. A flat-faced follower on an arm pivoted 90 from the cam's centre, delivering the symmetric cycloidal programme with a lift of 20, drawn at 60° of cam rotation. On the left the face is a line through the pivot, and the smallest base circle that keeps the cam convex is 28.679. On the right the face stands 33.56 off the pivot on a bracket, parallel to where it was, and the smallest convex base is 26.136 — 8.9% smaller. A sliding face needs 10.664, and neither arm reaches it. The dot is the contact; the small circle at the right is the pivot, and on both sides it clears the cam.

Where on the sine the arm swings

A flat face on a swinging arm delivers its programme through d sin ψ. Differentiating that twice brings in a square of the follower's speed, multiplied by sin ψ, and sin ψ has a sign. Standing the face off its pivot moves the swing down the sine until it straddles ψ = 0, where the square helps on one half of the stroke. On an arm ninety out that lowers the smallest convex base from 28.68 to 26.14, and it lets an arm of 61 have a cam where the face through the pivot needs 80. It never reaches the sliding face's 10.66.

cams · Cam A disc cut undersize, turned until a pin touches. A twelve-pin cycloidal drive whose disc was cut as if its pins were 1 larger than they are, drawn at 10° of the eccentric with the disc turned a further 1.082° about its own centre — the turn at which the first pin touches. One pin touches, pin 0, marked in its own colour. The pins within half the clearance of touching are drawn in a second colour and the rest plainly: 5 of the twelve are within half the clearance and 7 further off. The clearance is exaggerated so that it can be seen; at every clearance measured, one pin touches first.

A clearance leaves one contact

A cycloidal drive's disc, exactly as its pins generate it, touches nine or ten of its twelve pins at once, and that is why it can drive where two identical rotors cannot. Cut the disc two hundredths undersize, as a real drive is cut, and a rigid disc turned until it touches meets one pin, at every angle of the eccentric and in both directions. The arm that pin gives is never worse than the exact disc's best. What a clearance takes away is load sharing, and deflection gives it back: contacts that may give by the whole clearance put six or seven pins within reach.

meshing · Meshing The same drive with a smaller eccentric: every pin touches. Twelve pins on a ring of 60, pin radius 5, and the disc exactly as those pins generate it, at 10° of the eccentric. Left, the eccentric at exactly R/N = 5, whose roots are round sockets: 9 pins touch (solid) and 3 stand clear (dashed), the pins near the roots. Right, the eccentric at 0.8 of that, 4.00, whose roots are smooth: 12 of twelve touch. Over a pin pitch the socketed disc touches 9 or 10, and every smaller eccentric measured touches all twelve.

A disc whose roots are not sockets

Put a cycloidal drive's eccentric at exactly the pin circle's radius over the pin count and every root of its disc is a round socket; take any smaller eccentric and the roots are smooth. The sockets looked like a benefit — a pin in one closes its gap both ways at up to the full pitch offset. Measured from a half of that eccentric to all of it, they are the opposite. The socketed disc touches nine or ten of its twelve pins, every smaller one touches all twelve, and its first contact keeps the smallest share of the pitch offset of the seven. What a smaller eccentric really costs is the pitch offset itself: the free turn per unit of clearance is 0.0365 divided by the eccentric's share.

meshing · Meshing The flank bends towards the disc, and the pin's radius is measured against that bend. One root of a twelve-pin cycloidal drive, pin radius 5 on a ring of 60, with the eccentric at 0.97 of R/N. The thin line is the curve the pin's centre traces in the disc's frame, its tip pointing at the disc's centre; the dashed line is that curve offset towards the disc by the pin's radius, which is the disc's edge wherever nothing trims it. Either side of the tip the flank bends the other way, towards the disc, most tightly 22.6° of the eccentric from the root, with a radius of 5.36 (the circle, centre marked). The pin's radius, 5, is measured along the same normal to the offset point. The offset point stops short of the centre of curvature, so the offset does not fold and the root is untrimmed. The two meet at 0.9740 of R/N.

The flank that trims the root

A cycloidal disc's roots are trimmed, and its pins start standing clear, above an eccentric that was known only for one drive: 0.974 of the pin circle's radius over the pin count, for twelve pins of radius 5 on a ring of 60. The trimming is a bend. Either side of each root the flank of the pin's path curves towards the disc, and where that bend is tighter than the pin the offset folds. The bend has a closed form, so the threshold does too, √(1 − ρ²(N + 1)³/27(N − 1)) for pins of radius ρ, and it falls well below one for fat pins or many of them. On every drive measured, the classical eccentric loses contacts and lever together.

meshing · Meshing A tilted face and a shorter parallel bracket hold the same line. A flat face on an arm pivoted 70 from a cam's centre, at 70° of cam rotation, the symmetric cycloidal programme with a lift of 20, base circle 33.725. Dark bracket: the face held 43 off the pivot and tilted 30° to the bracket's normal. Light bracket: the face held parallel, 37.24 off the pivot, which is 43 cos 30°. Both put the face on the same line at every angle of the cam — the support from the cam's centre agrees to 2e-14 and the normal's direction to 9e-16 radians over a turn — so the cam, the contact and the force on the pivot are the same; the tilted arm only swings 30° further round.

An arm that lifts against the cam can beat a slide

A flat face on a swinging arm seemed to offer three choices: how far its pivot is from the cam, how far the face stands off the pivot, and the angle the face makes with its bracket. The angle is not a choice. A line fixed to a body turning about a pivot is fixed, up to the turning, by its distance from the pivot, so a face tilted β on a bracket c long is the face on a parallel bracket c cos β long, the same line at every instant. The real third choice is which way the arm lifts. On a symmetric programme the two ways are mirror images. On a quick rise, an arm lifting against the cam's turning needs a base circle of 6.6 to 13 where a sliding face needs 32.85, and one lifting with it needs 41 to 59, or has no convex cam at all.

cams · Cam Near its threshold, the disc's flank sharpens to a point under the pin. One root of a twelve-pin cycloidal disc, pins of radius 5 on a ring of 60, cut with the eccentric at 0.97 of the threshold 0.9740 R/N. The line is the disc's edge; the circle is a pin touching it at the flank's sharpest point, 31.0° of the eccentric from the root. There the edge bulges towards the pin with a radius of 2.23, the flank's bend 7.23 less the pin's 5 (small circle, centre marked), so the contact is convex against convex, and a line contact's pressure per unit load there is 1.80 times a pin on a flat. At the root itself the edge is a hollow round the pin.

A disc cut at its threshold grows a point

A cycloidal disc's roots stay untrimmed up to an eccentric where the pin path's flank bends with the pin's own radius, and it looked as though a disc cut exactly there would have its most conformal contact, the pin and the flank sharing a curvature. It has its least. The disc's edge is the path offset inwards by the pin's radius, so where the path bends round a centre on the disc's side the edge bulges towards the pin with the path's radius less the pin's: at the threshold, a point. A line contact's pressure per unit load there rises as the inverse square root of the distance to the threshold, and the pins passing it are carrying load. Each of four drives has an eccentric of least contact stress at 0.67 to 0.80 of its threshold; cut at 0.97, the peak pressure is 9% to 80% higher for a lever 21% to 46% longer.

meshing · Meshing Every boundary touches the circle on the rod. The coupler's plane in the rod's units, crank pin at (0, 0) and rocker pin at (1, 0). Shaded: the coupler points whose three departing double points are all real at a ratio of rocker to crank of 1, the region where R = λ⁴A + λ²B + C is negative; 8.1% of a window from −1.4 to 2.4 along the rod and ±1.5 across it. Dotted: the circles one rod from each pin, the boundary at the family's two ends. Dashed: the circle with the rod as its diameter. Every boundary in the family touches that circle and never crosses it; at this ratio it touches at (0.50, ±0.50), the points where −B/2A = λ². Inside it all three are real at every ratio.

Three discs decide the real double points

A four-bar growing into the elliptic trammel loses three double points, and how many of them are real depends on the coupler point and on the ratio λ of rocker to crank. The boundary of the region where all three are real is one polynomial, R = λ⁴A + λ²B + C, quadratic in λ² and short when written in the squared distances from the two pins. Its sign is the count at every one of 23,100 cells tried. As a quadratic in λ² its discriminant is the circle with the rod as diameter times a figure of eight, so that circle is touched by every boundary and crossed by none, and a coupler point's whole history along the family is settled by three discs.

algebra · Algebra A 45° rise: the slide's cam and the arm's, each as small as it can be. The quick programme with its rise of 20 shortened to 45°, cut for two flat-faced followers at the smallest base that keeps each cam convex, drawn to one scale. Left: a sliding face, base 185.56. Right: a face on an arm pivoted 90 from the cam's centre, lifting against the cam's turning and stood off −44.9, base 23.26, 8.0 times smaller. At that base the arm's cam stays convex for bases up to 1.0% larger, and no further.

A steep rise spends the arm's room

A flat face on an arm that lifts against the cam's turning needed a fifth of a sliding face's base on a 90° rise. Steepen the rise to 45° and the slide's base grows 5.6 times, to 185.6, while the arm's least base grows only 3.2 times, to 23.3. But the arm's least base sits where its cam is about to go concave on the return as well as the rise: the base can be raised by only a hundredth before the return fails. Ask for a tenth's room above the base and the arm's base grows 5.1 times, nearly the slide's rate, and at 35° no stand-off gives that room at all.

cams · Cam A relief as deep as the contact's own approach, spread across the flank. One root of the twelve-pin disc cut at 0.97 of its threshold, pins of radius 5 on a ring of 60, with the edge relieved inwards by a cosine bump of depth 0.01 and half-width 1 rad of eccentric centred on each flank. The relief is drawn 200 times deeper than it is: at true scale it is 0.2% of the pin's radius, the size of the contact's own approach at the design torque, and invisible. The thin line is the unrelieved edge; the pin touches it at the flank's sharpest point, where the unrelieved edge's radius is 2.23.

A relief is sized for one torque

A cycloidal disc cut near its trimming threshold has long levers and a point on each flank, where the pins carrying most of the load press hardest. Relieving the edge a little near the flanks can take most of that point away. On a twelve-pin drive at 0.97 of its threshold, a relief 0.01 deep spread across a radian either side of each flank lowers the peak contact pressure by a quarter and keeps every lever, to within 7% of the disc cut at its least-stress eccentric, whose levers are a fifth shorter. The relief does it by unloading the flank, not by reshaping it, so its depth must be the contact's own approach at the design torque. At a quarter of that torque it is worse than no relief at all, and a relief of hundredths of the pin's radius, which is what was expected to work, takes pins out of the load.

meshing · Meshing

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Conjugate-actionMeshing equationContact normalPitch pointBase circleDesign ruleCycloidal driveInvoluteBacklashClearanceflat-faced followerUndercut

All concepts