Concept

Overlap ratio — where it appears

How far a helical tooth or a twisted rotor advances along its own pitch, as a fraction of one pitch, measured across the face. It is bought with face width and helix angle alone, and at a whole number it makes a quantity integrated along the face — the length of contact, or the area open across a seal — constant through the turn.

Named by 5 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

One shaft angle, five places along a twisted rotor. A mismatched pair — a cycloidal rotor against a circular-tipped one of the same height, which are not each other's conjugates — with the rotors twisted by 1 lobe pitch along their length. The section at a given place along the shaft is the flat pair at an input angle shifted by the twist so far, so at one instant the five sections shown are at five different phases of the same mesh: the two bodies are into each other by 2.42 at the tightest section and 2.34 apart at the widest, with a mean of -0.408 across the whole seal. All five are drawn at one scale, and nothing here is meshed twice: one planar profile is read along a window.

A twist steadies what it cannot tighten

A helical rotor's sections are at different phases of the same mesh, so the clearance a machine has at one instant is a window along its own profile rather than a point on it. A wrap of exactly one lobe pitch holds the seal's open area constant through the turn — every harmonic at once, whatever the profile — and leaves its average, its tightest place and its widest place exactly where they were.

meshing · Meshing
The field of action, straight and slanted. The rectangle a contact lives in: its width is the usable line of action, its height is the face width, and a new contact line enters every base pitch. On the left the teeth are straight, so the lines are vertical and each one arrives and leaves all at once — the total length in contact jumps by a whole face width, 40 mm, every base pitch. On the right the same pair with a 20° helix: the lines lean by the base helix angle, so a tooth enters at one end of the face before it has left at the other, and the total changes by 3.44 mm instead of 40. Nothing about the profile is different between the two panels.

Contact that runs along the tooth

A straight tooth engages along its whole face at once, so the amount of contact at a mesh is a square wave. Slant the tooth and a second contact ratio appears that has no tooth count in it and no pressure angle — bought with face width and helix angle alone, and able to reach a value at which the total length of contact stops varying at all.

gears · Tooth
A taller, narrower field carries the same line. The field of action of two 17–51 pairs, drawn to one scale with the path of contact stretched 7 times: across, the transverse path of contact; up, the face width; the dark lines are the contact lines in it at one instant, a new one entering every base pitch. Left: the spur pair whose four knobs give the least worst-root sliding at a transverse contact ratio of 1.2, 0.834, on a face of 10 modules. Right: a 30° helical pair whose four knobs are chosen for a transverse contact ratio of 0.4, worst root 0.209, on a face of 26.5 modules, which is what carries the same mean length of line, 12.00 against 12.00 modules. Its overlap ratio is 4.21 and its total 4.61. At this instant 10.00 and 12.10 modules of line are in contact.

A helix pays for the root with face width

A spur pair's least worst-root sliding, 0.834 on a 17-tooth pinion driving a 51-tooth wheel, was bought by spending contact ratio down to the floor of 1.2 that continuity needs. A helical pair gets its continuity from the overlap along the face, so its transverse contact ratio can fall below that floor, and the root's sliding falls with it, nearly in proportion: 0.209 at a third of the contact and 0.102 at a sixth, on the pitch point's law π εα (1/z₁ + 1/z₂) / tan αw. The helix angle itself buys under a tenth. What pays is the face: the mean length of line in contact is the transverse ratio times the face, so carrying the spur pair's load on as much line at a third of the contact takes a face 2.65 times as wide.

gears · Tooth
The line in contact swings, and the least of it is what a tooth carries. A helical pair at a transverse contact ratio of 0.4 and an overlap ratio of 3.5. Left: the field of action, 0.4 of a base pitch across and the face up, with the contact lines at the moment the total length in contact is least; each line crosses the face while advancing 3.5 base pitches, so only a short piece of each lies in the field. Right: the total length in contact over one base pitch, as a share of its mean, 0.857 at its least and 1.143 at its most; the closed form b/(εβ cos βb)·[εα εβ − min(nα nβ, (1 − nα)(1 − nβ))] gives the least exactly. Dashed: the spur optimum at εα 1.2, which carries its whole face for four fifths of a pitch and twice it for one fifth, 0.833 and 1.667 of its mean.

The face carries the least line

A helical pair that gives up transverse contact to cut its root's sliding was priced by the face it needs to carry the spur optimum's mean length of contact line: 2.65 times as wide, at a third of the contact on a 30° helix. But the length in contact swings through every base pitch and the peak load stands on its least value. That least has a closed form in the fractional parts of the two contact ratios, exact against the swept field to 10⁻¹³. The spur optimum's own least is its face, a sixth below its mean, so least against least the factor is 2.21 when the overlap ratio is a whole number. Real faces land between whole numbers and need 2.21 to 2.87 times the spur's, 2.39 on a spur face of ten modules, and above 2.65 only on faces under ten. And a steeper helix is not always more line: at a fixed face, raising the overlap ratio from 1 to 1.5 takes a third of the least line away.

gears · Tooth
Where on the field the root band sits, and when it is loaded most. A helical pair at a transverse contact ratio of 0.4 and an overlap ratio of 1.5. Left: the field of action, the path across and the face up, with the bands a tenth of the path wide at each end shaded, where the sliding is worst, and the contact lines at the moment the share of the load in those bands is largest, 1.36 times its even value. Right: over one base pitch, the share of the load in the root bands over its even value (solid), and the total length in contact over its greatest (dashed), least 0.667 of its mean.

The least line carries the root

A helical pair's length of contact line swings through every base pitch, and the peak load stands on its least value. The roots, where the sliding is worst, sit at the two ends of the path of contact. The share of the load carried there swings too, and in the limit of a thin root band it reaches its peak while the line in contact is least: half as much again as an even share at overlap ratios just above one, a quarter above two, a sixth above three. A whole-number overlap ratio removes both swings at once. So the overlap that makes the least line largest is also the one that spreads the root's load evenly, and a face sized on the least line alone understates the root's worst moment by the root's own swing.

gears · Tooth

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Contact ratioLine of actionDesign rulePitchProfile shiftBase pitchClearanceConjugate-actionHarmonicInvoluteLobeMesh

All concepts