Machine Kinematics
solved, then drawn
Concept

Platform — where it appears

The moving body of a parallel mechanism, carried by several legs at once. Its pose is what the legs' lengths jointly decide, and finding it from them is the hard direction rather than the easy one.

Named by 15 essays across 4 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Three legs, one platform. A 3-RRR planar parallel mechanism at (0.20, -0.15) turned 11.5°, elbows up/up/up. The three actuator angles were computed one leg at a time and independently, which is what makes this direction cheap. The dashed lines extend each leg's second link: those are the three forces the legs can transmit to the platform, and the mechanism is controllable exactly while they stay independent. Here they miss one another by 0.651, and the smallest singular value of the three is 0.9550. At this position the platform can be turned through 206° in all before a leg runs out of reach.

The easy problem and the hard one change places

For a robot arm, working out where the hand is takes a walk down a chain and working out what the joints must be to put it somewhere is the hard part. Connect the platform by three legs instead of one and both statements reverse — and the reversal is not a matter of degree.

parallel · Parallel Losing a freedom and gaining one. Left, the nearest inverse-kinematic singularity: a leg is straight to 1.1e-5 and cannot reach further, so the platform has lost a freedom. That is the workspace boundary and it is a serial arm's singularity. Right, the nearest direct-kinematic singularity: the three leg lines pass through one point to 0.0001, so the three forces the legs transmit are no longer independent and the platform can turn about that point with every actuator locked. It has gained a freedom, and it is 1.97 from the other configuration and nowhere near the edge of the reach.

Locked, and still moving

A serial arm goes singular at the edge of its reach, where it loses a freedom, and the failure is visible as an arm gone straight. A parallel mechanism has a second kind with no serial counterpart — it gains a freedom, in the middle of the workspace, at poses nothing about the legs' reach marks out.

parallel · Parallel 6 ways to assemble the same three actuator angles. The actuators are at 216°, 48°, 144° in every panel, so the three elbows are at the same three points throughout and only the platform differs. Each pose satisfies all three legs to 6.7e-16. Found by reducing the problem to one equation in the platform angle and scanning it at 0.100° — exhaustive to that resolution and no further, which is the honest thing to say about a root count. Over a survey of 6750 actuator triples this mechanism ranges from none to 6.

One command, six answers

Lock the three motors of a planar platform and the platform can be in as many as six different poses, every one of them satisfying every leg exactly. Which one it is in was decided by how it was assembled and where it has been since — and the number of answers is not a property of the mechanism but of where the motors happen to be.

parallel · Parallel Six legs, six numbers. A Gough–Stewart platform at (0.00, 0.00, 2.40) with a rotation vector of (0.00, 0.00, 0.15). The six leg lengths run from 3.077 to 3.263, and every one of them was computed from the pose by a single subtraction and a square root, with no leg consulting another. Going the other way — six lengths in, one pose out — takes an iterative solve and does not have one answer. The six leg lines span a screw system of order 6; the smallest singular value of the six is 0.0316, which is how far this pose is from a configuration where they become dependent and the platform stops being controllable.

Six legs and a square root

A Gough–Stewart platform's inverse problem is one subtraction and one square root per leg, computed six times without any leg consulting another. Its forward problem has forty solutions. That gap is the whole design, and it is why flight simulators are built this way and robot arms are not.

parallel · Parallel Three bars, and no rotation left. Each of a delta robot's legs ends in a parallelogram, which keeps the bar on the platform parallel to the bar on the arm. That leg therefore permits the platform no turn about either direction perpendicular to its bar: it imposes two couple constraints, drawn here as rings about the directions they act on. Three legs impose 6; together they span only 3, so 3 are redundant. What is reciprocal to them is three couples — three pure translations, and the platform cannot turn at all.

Why the platform stays flat

A delta robot has three legs and three freedoms, and there is no obvious reason those freedoms should be the three translations rather than some mixture. The reason is a parallelogram in each leg, and the argument from there to "the platform cannot turn at all" is a constraint computation that takes six wrenches and a rank.

parallel · Parallel Where the platform stops being controllable, at 0°. Every point is a position of the platform's centre at a fixed orientation of 0°, shaded by how far it is from a direct singularity — pale is near. Unshaded means unreachable, which is the workspace boundary and the ordinary kind of singularity. The line is det A = 0, traced through the field rather than tested for: it runs through the middle of the reachable region in 102 segments, and on it the platform can move with all three actuators locked. 3312 of 6561 sampled positions are reachable.

The workspace is not a shape you choose

A serial arm's reach is roughly a sphere and can be quoted as a number. A parallel mechanism's is the intersection of three reachability conditions, changes with every degree of orientation, and has a surface of uncontrollable poses cutting through the middle of it. There is no formula. There is a map, and it has to be computed.

parallel · Parallel Kutzbach, plus the constraints counted twice. Each row is 6(n − j − 1) + Σf, then the redundant constraints ν measured from the two legs' constraint systems, then the mobility measured from the rank of the whole loop's screw system. The first column is wrong for 5 of 6 of these mechanisms; adding ν repairs every one. The catch is that ν is not a property of the joint graph — Bennett's linkage and a spatial four-bar with one twist changed have the same graph and different ν — so the corrected formula needs the measurement it was supposed to replace.

The formula is repaired by the thing it replaced

Kutzbach's count is wrong about most of the mechanisms worth building, and every textbook gives the same repair — add back the constraints that were imposed twice. The repair works on every loop in these essays. It is also not a formula, because the number it adds cannot be read off the joint graph.

constraint · Spatial What every pair of groups meets in. The intersection of two subgroups is always a subgroup — that needs no computation — and which one is the useful part. This is the design rule behind every parallel machine in these essays: choose legs whose groups meet in the motion the platform is wanted to have, and it has that motion whatever the leg lengths are, with no synthesis and no tolerance. The row and column are built about different axes, at right angles, because an intersection is a statement about particular subgroups rather than about their kinds: two planar groups with the same normal meet in the whole of themselves, and two with different normals meet in a line.

Three legs and one plane

The parallel field argued that a platform stays flat from the structure of its legs, one leg at a time. The same fact is one line of linear algebra: each leg confines the platform to a group, the platform gets the intersection, and an intersection of groups is a group whatever the leg lengths are. The motion type is decided before a single dimension is chosen.

parallel · Parallel What every pair of groups meets in. The intersection of two subgroups is always a subgroup — that needs no computation — and which one is the useful part. This is the design rule behind every parallel machine in these essays: choose legs whose groups meet in the motion the platform is wanted to have, and it has that motion whatever the leg lengths are, with no synthesis and no tolerance. The row and column are built about different axes, at right angles, because an intersection is a statement about particular subgroups rather than about their kinds: two planar groups with the same normal meet in the whole of themselves, and two with different normals meet in a line.

Legs intersect

A serial chain multiplies its joints' groups and the product is almost never a group. A parallel machine's platform gets the intersection of what its legs permit — and an intersection of groups is a group, always, with no coincidence required. That is the only construction in this field that produces closure for free, and it is why a platform can be designed for a motion type instead of discovered to have one.

pairs · Pair Three joints, and the three screws that describe them. A leg of three revolute joints, drawn as its three axes, and the principal screws of the three-system they span, drawn through the system's own centre. The three principal axes are mutually perpendicular — worst cosine 1.1e-16 — and they meet at one point, missing it by 2.6e-16. Their pitches are -0.3766, -0.0338, 0.8075, and every screw the leg leaves free has a pitch the three of them give by h₁l² + h₂m² + h₃n². Nothing in the three joint axes looks like a right angle and the system's own frame is one.

What a leg of three joints leaves free

Five essays of this field have computed the order of a screw system and drawn none of them. A three-joint leg spans a three-system; its three principal axes are mutually perpendicular and meet at a point, six numbers price every screw in the family, and the directions of the lines it contains form a cone.

spatial · Spatial What a leg of three joints permits and what it resists, on one frame. The leg of three revolute joints in grey, and the principal screws of two three-systems drawn through one centre: the twists the leg lets its platform make, and the wrenches it holds without any joint turning. They are computed separately — the second is the reciprocal complement of the first, found by its own eigenproblem — and they come out with the same centre, 5e-16 apart, and the same three axes, parallel to 0e+0. Only the pitches differ, and each wrench pitch is its twist's with the sign reversed, to 1e-15: -0.3766 against 0.3766, -0.0338 against 0.0338, 0.8075 against -0.8075.

The lines a leg turns about and the lines it is pushed along

A leg of three revolute joints permits a three-system of motions and resists a three-system of loads. The two share a centre and three axes and differ only in the sign of every pitch — and the revolute axes of the first and the lines of force of the second are the two rulings of one hyperboloid, every line of one meeting every line of the other.

spatial · Spatial Two legs that share a line of force. Two legs of three revolute joints each under one platform, drawn about their common centre: the first leg's joints in one colour and the second's in another. The second leg was built so that each of its joints passes through a point of one line, the dark one, which also crosses all three joints of the first leg — the six marked points, each met to 1e-16. A force along that line does no work on any joint of either leg, so both legs resist it: it is a load path the platform has twice over. The dashed line is what comes with it: the axis of the one twist both legs permit, a screw of pitch -0.049 that passes 0.032 from the shared line at 57.2° to it. Dragging moves the shared line along the first leg's first joint and builds the second leg afresh through each position.

A shared load is a shared motion

Put two legs of three revolute joints under one platform and let them share a line of force, so that both carry the same load. The platform does not merely gain a redundant load path; it gains a motion in the same act, because three constraints and three make six. The motion is a screw about a different line, tied to the shared one by h cos φ = d sin φ on two hundred constructed pairs to 4 × 10⁻¹⁵. Pushed along it, the two legs part as the square of the push: the platform shakes and does not move.

spatial · Spatial A third leg that keeps the platform's shake. The two legs of the earlier construction — the second built through a line of force of the first, the dark line — share one twist, whose axis is the dashed line: a screw of pitch -0.049. A third leg is drawn in a third colour, built so that its three joints span a family of motions containing that twist: two joints chosen freely and the third solved for. The platform on all three legs keeps its one freedom. The dotted line is the axis of the one wrench the third leg shares with the first: a screw of pitch 0.201, not a line of force, and 0.244 from the pair's shared line. Dragging picks another third leg from the same family.

A third leg that keeps the shake

Two three-joint legs that share a line of force share one twist as well, and a third leg in general position takes it away. A third leg whose own freedom contains that twist does not, and building one is three conditions on twelve numbers: two joints anywhere and the third solved for. Such a leg must share a load with each of the first two — but not the line they share. What it shares with each is a screw with a pitch of its own, reciprocal to the twist through the sum of their two pitches, and only a third leg built through the pair's line shares the line itself. With any of them the platform still shakes rather than moves.

spatial · Spatial Turning one joint about the shared line tunes the shake's first coefficient to nought. Two legs of three revolute joints each under one platform, sharing a line of force, the dark line, that crosses every joint of both — so they share one twist and the platform shakes along it. The second leg's first joint is turned about the shared line by 0°, which keeps it crossing the line and keeps the shared twist. The shake's second-order coefficient, the reciprocal product of the shared wrench with half the difference of the two legs' bracket terms, is 2.62e-2 here. It passes through nought at 36.488° and again at 109.612°; at those turns the platform still shakes, one order higher.

A shake has an order

Two legs of three joints that share a line of force let a platform shake: pushed along the one twist they share, the legs part as the square of the push. The square's coefficient is a bracket of the legs' own joints, computable without pushing at all, and it can be tuned to nought by turning one joint. The shake does not become a motion. It moves up an order, to the cube, and a second tuned joint moves it to the fourth power. Each order is one more condition, and only legs whose freedoms are groups meet them all.

spatial · Spatial A pair moves until its gap reaches what its joints' play can take up. Two legs of three revolute joints each, sharing one twist, pushed along it: the gap left between their nearest poses, along the one wrench they share, for the pair built through the shared line, the pair with one joint tuned and the pair with two. The horizontal line is the gap the six joints' play can take up, 4.52 times a radial play of 10⁻⁶. Each pair travels until its curve meets the line: built through the shared line, 1.31e-2; one joint tuned, 6.63e-2; two joints tuned, 1.39e-1.

A shake travels as a root of the play

Two three-revolute legs that share a twist let their platform shake along it: the gap between their nearest poses grows as the square of the push, or the cube once one joint is tuned, or the fourth power once two are. With play in the joints, the pair moves until that gap uses up what the play can take, and that is a root: the square, cube or fourth root of the play. At a play of a millionth the three pairs travel 0.013, 0.066 and 0.139 along their twist. A tuned joint is worth more the tighter the joints are, five times the travel at a millionth and eleven at a hundred-millionth.

spatial · Spatial

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

ConstraintParallel mechanismReciprocal screwScrew systemLegScrewTwistSingularityDirect singularityWorkspaceWrenchForward kinematics

All concepts