Ratchet — where it appears
Named by 7 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The mechanism that waits
Every mechanism in this collection so far moves whenever its input moves. A ratchet, an indexer and an escapement do not: they are still for most of a turn and moving for the rest, and what decides which is not an equation running out of answers but a tooth arriving at a face.
A joint that works one way
A pawl either holds a ratchet or is levered out of it, and which one happens is decided by two lines through the contact. One of them is the rule a workshop quotes. The other is the boundary that rule leaves out, and a check written to confirm the quoted rule turned out to be incapable of failing.
The resolution is the pitch
A ratchet's step and a ratchet's error are the same number. Nothing about how well it is made improves that, more pawls divide it by a whole number, and the obvious remedy — cut more teeth — runs into a wall that is geometric rather than practical: at a tooth depth of 0.16 radii the construction stops at twenty-nine.
The escapement that could not alternate
Four drawings of intermittent mechanisms that appear everywhere and would not work: pallets spanning a whole number of teeth, a pawl whose pivot is on the wrong side of the tooth face, a Geneva at the wrong centre distance, and an intermittent gear with no locking arc. Each one is put through the library that draws the working version, and each returns a number.
One piece, and still not reachable
The site decides whether two configurations can be joined by asking whether they are in the same connected component, and that relation is symmetric because a path run backwards is a path. A one-way mechanism breaks the symmetry and leaves the connectivity alone: its free space is a single interval with no barrier anywhere in it, and about half of the ordered pairs of states cannot be joined by any admissible motion.
A ratchet with no teeth
A roller clutch holds one way and runs free the other with nothing on it a tooth could be called. Whether it grips is a question about friction, which no drawing settles. How far it moves before it does is geometry: a clearance divided by the gap's own slope, so its lost motion is a length rather than a fraction of a pitch — 1.4° against a 24-tooth ratchet's 15° — and unlike a ratchet's it is not divided by adding more holding elements.
Six things an indexer is not
More pins make a Geneva smoother, a finer ratchet is a more precise one, a locked wheel is a still wheel, a curved slot gives a smooth start, a cam indexer is always gentler than a Geneva, and a mechanism whose states are all in one piece can go from any of them to any other. Six things said about indexing mechanisms, each the natural reading of something true, each answered by a number the timing essays measured. They fail the same way: each judges the mechanism by its motion, and an indexer is decided at its switches — the instants a pin enters, a pawl drops or a lock takes over.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Intermittent motionPawlthe Geneva mechanismIndexingContact stateLost motionClearanceContact normalDesign ruleDwellEscapementOne way